Sync Weekly

Archive for the ‘Pop Culture, Movies, Music, etc.’ Category

Is it just a cartoon or something deeper?

Friday, April 30th, 2010

What do you think of the Southpark situation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

In the article Who’s Afraid of South Park.  Frida is very condeming of the execs over at Comedy Central.

Background Story:  Basically there is a extreme Muslim website that said if SouthPark aired a show that depicted Muhammed in a comedic way thay would suffer the fate of Theo Van Gogh, who was almost decapitated for a film he made about the Koran.

Frida’s editorial say’s that Comedy Central allowed fear to make them give up their 1st amendment rights.   Now some would argue that it’s just a cartoon that isn’t worth risking your life over.  So which side are you on?  Is it something deeper?   Or is it just a cartoon not worth dying over?

http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2010/apr/29/columnists-whos-afraid-south-park-20100429/

Who’s afraid of South Park?

By BY FRIDA GHITIS MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands — Despite much-quoted claims to the contrary, evidence abounds that the sword frequently defeats the pen. If you don’t believe me, come to Amsterdam, to the bustling street where, in plain daylight four years ago, a man called Mohammed Bouyeri cut the throat of Theo Van Gogh, almost severing his head off.

By way of explanation, the Dutch-born Bouyeri plunged a knife into Van Gogh’s body, skewering into him a letter threatening to also kill Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a fierce critic of Islam, whohad collaborated with Van Gogh on a film about the Koran. The killer, it seems, did not like the film.

Another similarly disposed art critic brought up Van Gogh’s name a few days ago in the United States. Writing on the website Revolution-Muslim.com, he threatened a fate equal to what befell Van Gogh’s for the creators of South Park, the animated cartoon that makes it a pointto offend just about everyone. According to Revolution Muslim, a South Park episode depicting the Prophet Mohammed (in a bear suit) along with figures from other religions is a crime punishable by death.

Quoting Islamic scholars, Revolution Muslim explains that, “Whoever curses the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessing of Allah be upon him)-a Muslim or a non-Muslim-he must be killed and this is the opinion of the general body of Islamic scholars.”

While most Muslims would not shed blood over a comedy show, we have known for a good many years that among the followers of Islam there are those who would kill anyone-even other Muslims-who offends their religious sensibilities. That is not news. What we learned from the South Park event, however, is just as troubling. In the face of threats, the bosses at Comedy Central folded like cheap TV trays. Comedy Central heavily censored the cartoon, granting the blackmailer exactly what he wanted. Forget Land of the Free, etc. They gave up without even considering a fight.

Jon Stewart, the Comedy Central faux anchorman, regaled viewers with a musical number carrying a message to Revolution Muslim. Marveling at the extremists’ chutzpah for living in New York-home of the world’s best Jewish delis-and enjoying American freedoms only to threaten South Park’s Matt Stone and TreyParker and their freedom of expression, Stewart sang a feverish, and profane, song telling the blackmailers exactly where to go, complete with backup gospel choir.

But Stewart went curiously easy on Comedy Central’s spinelessness. “It’s their right,” he allowed. “The censorship is a decision Comedy Central made to protect their employees.”

Yes, they can do it. But that doesn’t make it any less scandalous. Comedy Central should have hired bodyguards for Stone and Parker and aired the episode uncut. That way the rich and powerful corporation (Viacom) could have really protected them-protected their safetyand their freedom of speech and their ability to do their work and to give Americans their often-hilarious and frequently cringe-worthy material. It goes without saying, but let’s say it anyway, that nobody is required to watch the show. Not Muslims, not Mormons-whose theology South Park mercilessly mocks. Not Jews, not Christians, not anybody.

The show often goes over theline. Those who find it offensive can change the channel. They can write letters, start boycotts, picket the studios. Death threats are simply not acceptable. Caving in to them is shameful.

Too many times in the West we have seen powerful media empires behave like craven weaklings. It was Bart Simpson, aptly, who put it best, writing a hundred times on the blackboard “South Park-We’d stand beside you if we weren’t so scared.”

A few years ago, after extremists threatened (and later attempted) to kill a Danish cartoonist for depicting Mohammed in his work, I saw the artist interviewed on CNN, my once-proud home. When the cartoonist tried to hold up a page with the drawings, CNN almost tackled the camera to the ground to keep the pictures from airing. Cowardice was never so pathetically hilarious.

Theo Van Gogh, whose antics occasionally resembled South Park’s in their tastelessness, discovered that his pen was no match for a killer’s sword. And yet, the pen, the keyboard, the comedian, the editorial cartoon, Bart Simpson, Cartman, Kyle and Kenny actually hold enormous power. To win, however, they need their backers to show backbone. Too bad South Park’s bosses have none.

Jackie Robinson Day

Friday, April 16th, 2010

kevin-blackistone.fanhouse.com/2010/04/15/jackie-robinson-day-whitewashes-baseballs-sordid-history/

No, conference callers Rice has not left the building, been deleted or shuffled loose this mortal coil. Not going to offer excuses, but I have returned.  Yesterday, apart from being tax day, was Jackie Robinson day in major league baseball. This prompted the article above from Kevin Blackistone.  I heard a lot of discussion on my local (Houston) sports radio affiliate about the merits of the article and the designation by MLB of Jackie Robinson day.

Mr. Blackistone calls the institution of Jackie Robinson day in major league baseball “a most-remarkable whitewashing of American History” and “one of the greatest public relations and marketing campaigns of all time.” He claims that “it pulled the wool over the eyes of an increasingly philistine public.” He also makes the assertion later in the article that Larry Doby’s charging of the mound 10 years later a more significant contribution for black dignity.

I believe that Mr. Blackistone is entitled to his opinion, of course, but I find that I disagree whole heartedly.  I believe that Robinson’s contribution was dramatic and deserving of praise for exactly the reasons why Mr. Blackistone dismisses it. Robinson was a fighter, as evidenced by his willingness to suffer a court martial rather than take a seat at the back of the bus while stationed in Fort Hood TX, but he was also smart enough to know what weapons served him best in the fight before him. He knew that he was fighting for something greater than himself. He knew that whatever personal satisfaction he may have garnered from physically fighting back was dwarfed by the consequences that they would have for future generations of non-white baseball players.

Was it wrong that he should have to approach the game differently than his white teammates? Yes. Was MLB’s instituting of Jackie Robinson day a PR “stunt?” Probably, but lets be honest what these days is not part of someone’s PR campaign. Should he have had to endure the racial epithets thrown around by fans, players, and umpires alike? No. What is right is the way he conducted himself. When others were behaving like animals he was a man and rose above the petty taunting of those around him proving himself better than those who would judge the worth of a man by anything other than his character.

I don’t claim to know all about everything that transpired between the beginning of the segregation of MLB and Robinson’s arrival on the scene, I wasn’t yet born, but I do believe that Robinson’s contribution is worthy of notoriety and honor. I also am of the opinion that sometimes the most heroic people in our lives are not the ones who make the biggest splash, but the ones who simply behave better (read more human) than anyone has any right to expect they should. Hows that for dignity my friends?

So, yeah I’m a fan of Jackie Robinson day, and not only because my Astro’s won their first game of the season with the whole team wearing #42 ;-)

What say you?

~Rice

Privacy? WTF Is Privacy?

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

The Library of Congress is archving every Tweet in the public timeline. How do you feel about it?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Do you have a Twitter account?

Have you considered running for public office any time soon?  Say, in the next… forever?

Consider this: http://www.loc.gov/tweet/how-tweet-it-is.html

“Have you ever sent out a “tweet” on the popular Twitter social media service? Congratulations: Your 140 characters or less will now be housed in the Library of Congress.

That’s right. Every public tweet, ever, since Twitter’s inception in March 2006, will be archived digitally at the Library of Congress. That’s a LOT of tweets, by the way: Twitter processes more than 50 million tweets every day, with the total numbering in the billions.”

In other words, the Library of Congress will have record of every #drunktweet, epic fail, crude joke, rant, and foot-in-the mouth statement we have ever made.

Kanye West made a song titled, “Big Brother.”  Now would be a good time to play it.

Anywho, if you look at it from a historical standpoint, tweets such as the first ever tweet and President Obama’s tweet after winning the 2008 election will be archived.  If you look at it from a panic standpoint, yes, your tweet on the trending topic of #sexisgoodwhen will also be on record (if your tweets are part of the public timeline).

If the Library of Congress can archive Tweets, then they certainly can archive Facebook data.

The purpose of this post, however, is not to get you paranoid.  Just be mindful of the information that you put out there for the world to see. When you put electronic information out, you are leaving a digital footprint.  In some cases, it’s out there forever.  Just remember, YOU control what YOU put out there about YOU, and everyone doesn’t need to know every intimate detail about your life, thoughts, etc.

Thoughts?  Gather around the conference room table.

Scrubs: What Happened?

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/24/scrubs-dead-or-alive/

If you’re a fan of the TV show, Scrubs, then you have probably noticed the sudden decline of the show since it went from NBC to ABC.  As mentioned in the CNN article above, the writer’s strike from ‘07-’08 had a lot to do with the show’s demise.  J.D., one of the show’s main characters (if not the main character), is no longer on the show… along with several other core cast members.

I was aware that the show had moved to ABC, so I tuned in one night.  A few of my observations:

- Midway through watching Scrubs 2.0, I thought I was watching Saved By the Bell: The New Class.

- Watching the new Scrubs is like looking at the Matrix in a different hue of puke-green.

- Comic Book Guy, from The Simpsons, made an appearance sometime during the show.  He was quoted as saying, “Worst…episode…ever.”  Another episode aired the following week.

- I wasn’t aware at first that J.D. wasn’t on the show anymore.  After realizing he wasn’t there, I figured they had killed him off… or maybe there were some budget cuts… or he pulled a Katherine Heigl

- This just in:  The ABC version of Scrubs will be the first television show to come out on View Master instead of DVD/Blu-Ray.

Needless to say, the new version sucks!

Anti-Resolution

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Happy New Year.  Welcome to a new decade and all that jazz.

As I go into the New Year, I dread going back to the gym.  Every year I have to wait hours on end to get to my machine because someone has decided that their new years resolution is to take off a few thousand pounds this year only to give up in a week when they realize it actually takes work.

I hate resolutions.  Most people make them and never stick to them.  I also don’t like them because I feel like you knew you needed to change well before the New Year started.

A read a blog today on Biggerpockets.com  that said it best (read the full entry here)…

Resolutions are generally nothing more than a “wish list” of things people want in their lives. They seldom remember them by mid-year, much less bring them to fruition by year end. This truth is why the whole resolution process has been diluted to not much more than the punch line of a joke….But isn’t the quality of your life more than a joke? Isn’t the quality of your relationships more than an item on some vague “wish list”?

 

Why not decide today, right now, to make 2010 the year you took your life back from mediocrity? Instead of treating your hopes and dreams like a “wish list”, create a plan to make them a reality. Create your life, don’t just “get through” it. You do not have to settle for an average life. Instead of resolutions, write down clear, vivid goals…then start to plan specific actions steps to achieve them. I can tell you from experience, if you begin to unlock your mind to your true potential, you will transform your life. I’ve done it.

There is only one person who can change your life…YOU. And you can do it, you simply have to break free from the chains of self-limiting beliefs. I’ve studied personal development for some time and only recently put it together to see my true potential. And I can promise you, once you take off the self imposed blinders of doubt and fear, life truly begins. Don’t live to someone else’s idea of what happiness is….design your life or someone else will….

So….resolve to not make resolutions…instead, take responsibility for your life…absolute responsibility…then you will start to live your dream life…

So Conference Callers.  Do you believe in resolutions?  Do you ever follow them?

Monday Roundup

Monday, December 21st, 2009

mou900_digimemo_a501b

Here’s a quick recap of what’s transpired over the weekend, and in the last week:

Actress, Brittany Murphy, of “8 Mile,” and, “Clueless,” fame, died yesterday morning of natural causes: http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/12/20/brittany.murphy/index.html

The Cowboys kept the Saints from going undefeated, handing them their first loss of the season: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/6439/saints-far-from-perfect-as-playoffs-approach

The Senate voted to end debate on the controversial healthcare bill.  A final vote on the bill is expected on Christmas Eve: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/21/health.care.senate.vote/index.html

Avatar is the #1 movie in the world right now.  It’s being praised as one of the most visually amazing movies ever: http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/20/boxoffice.avatar.ew/index.html

Oh, and Tiger Woods is getting a divorce.

Is there anything we missed?  Which story, in your opinion, is the biggest story to happen in the recent days?

All Hail Google!!!

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

googledomination

A couple of weeks ago Kev did a post on Google and it’s aims at cloud computing.

I have been been keeping up with the news and it seems like everyday this week Google has had something in the news that will revolutionize the way we use computers.  Here are just a few things…

Google Goggles – This allows users to search by pics.

Real Time Searches – As you are typing it, it becomes a search result.

Google DNS – Bascially creating a phonebook of all websites for you.

And that’s just the tip of the ice berg.  Have you ever taken a look at everything Google offers. It’s kind of scary.

Don’t get me wrong.  I love Google.  I use Google Chrome.  I have a Gmail.  Account.  I was even thinking about getting the Droid at one time. 

I think they are creating a new realm of computing that we will all enjoy.  But they are also becoming a huge company that can rival Microsoft  and they collect a lot of your information everytime you use one of their products.  So let’s keep our eyes on King Google. 

What are you’re thoughts?  Do you think Google is scary?  Do you trust them?  Am I being paranoid? 

Don’t answer that last question.

Attraction-Harassment Scale

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

nice guy bad guy

 So you are at work, and Jimmy the office “nice guy” comes over to say good morning.  This is probably the hardest part of your day.  Now Jimmy’s a good guy, but you’re just not attracted to him.  And he usually lingers a little too long when he hugs you.  Well one day Jimmy takes your kind hug as his entry into trying something a little further.  Maybe he decides to tell you, “you look really nice” or “he wants to take you on a date”.  Now if you are a rational creature you will tell him politely no and hopefully it doesn’t ruin the office place acquaintance.  Or you could be crazy as a loon and call sexual harassment on him. 

 Then you have Kent.  Kent is the office Brad Pitt/Hottie/Slut.  Well one night you and Kent are working late and he decides he’s going to try to have his way with you.  Next thing you know, the copy machine is taking full color photos of your nether region.

 Now how is it that possible that two of your co-workers can approach in two different ways and get inexplicable results?  One guy almost gets a face full of pepper spray while being respectful and the other gets a chance to make a fond memory at the copy machine by treating you like dirt. 

 Well it’s a little thing I like to call the Attraction-Harassment scale. 

 Note: Don’t try to take it.  It’s already copyrighted.

 Attraction Harassment Scale

   There is basically an inverse relationship between how attracted you are to a person and how you gauge their actions towards you. 

 In other words… The uglier a person is to you, the less you will let them get away with. 

 It is derived from the Crazy-Hot scale from the show How I Met Your Mother?.  I love that show.  Barney Stinson for President!

 You see it all the time in your daily life…

 1.Regular dude sends a drink.  Girl takes it and pays him no mind.  Rich guy sends a bottle.  Girl goes home with rich guy.

 2.Girl attracted to a guy plays hard to get, and guy engages her in said game.  Girl not attracted to guy “pursuing” claims he’s a bug-a-boo/stalker.

 So give me an example of your Attraction-Harassment episodes.  Do you think the scale is right?

Sensory Overload!

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

bspwomancoveringears-300x300

There is a lot of news going on in the world today… a smorgasbord, if you will.

Unemployment is over 10%.

A 5 year old child is dead because her mother sold her into prostitution.

The President is capping off a week in Asia.  China told him, “Look, man.  You’re cool, but we hold a lot of your country’s debt.  Yet, you guys have a huge deficit.  So ummmm, yeah.  Do you think we don’t intend to get our money?  Gettin’ real tired of you duckin’ me maannnn!”

The Senate just unveiled a 2,074 page health reform bill. 

Speaking of healthcare, a government task force just concluded that women in their 40’s don’t need annual mammograms.

Beverly Hills Vampire 90210 Twilight: New Moon is coming out this weekend.

Jay-Z, Alicia Keys, and New York have the #1 song in the country right now.

Speaking of New York, the Yankees have more wins (2) in the month of November than the Jets, Giants, and Knicks. 

The Razorbacks are playing spades with their basketball team.  They have 5 in the starting lineup and a possible.

The State Lottery is bringing in money hand-over-fist…

And Sarah Palin is the most popular person in America right now.

I just don’t know where to begin!

What say you?  What news story, including or not including those mentioned above, has stood out the most to you this week?

The Truth Is in the Clouds…

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

cloud

Cloud computing is taking over.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/04/cloud.computing.hunt/index.html

Do you use Google Docs?  Do you upload videos to YouTube?  Are all of your vacation photos on Flickr?  Do you upload all of your photo albums on Facebook? 

If yes, then you’re cloud computing.

According to Wikipedia, cloud computing is Internet based development and use of computer technology.  The term, “cloud,” is a metaphor for the Internet.  Basically, everything we do and all of our services are conducted on the Internet.

Google is one of the main companies at the forefront of this new phenomenon.  There lies a possible future where computers may come without hard drives.  Everything would be stored “in the clouds.”  But can you trust what you can’t see?  Today, we already trust online banking with our most sensitive information. 

The truth really lies in a quote from the above article: “All the clouds live in data centers,” says Rich Miller, “There’s always hardware involved, and bricks and mortar. … It’s not a fluffy cloud. It’s living in someone’s building.”

Where do you see the future of computing going?  Do you fully trust cloud computing?  Would you completely rely on it?  Do you still prefer to back up most of your information on your own hardware?