Categories: Pop Culture, Movies, Music, etc.

Privacy? WTF Is Privacy?

The Library of Congress is archving every Tweet in the public timeline. How do you feel about it?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Do you have a Twitter account?

Have you considered running for public office any time soon?  Say, in the next… forever?

Consider this: http://www.loc.gov/tweet/how-tweet-it-is.html

“Have you ever sent out a “tweet” on the popular Twitter social media service? Congratulations: Your 140 characters or less will now be housed in the Library of Congress.

That’s right. Every public tweet, ever, since Twitter’s inception in March 2006, will be archived digitally at the Library of Congress. That’s a LOT of tweets, by the way: Twitter processes more than 50 million tweets every day, with the total numbering in the billions.”

In other words, the Library of Congress will have record of every #drunktweet, epic fail, crude joke, rant, and foot-in-the mouth statement we have ever made.

Kanye West made a song titled, “Big Brother.”  Now would be a good time to play it.

Anywho, if you look at it from a historical standpoint, tweets such as the first ever tweet and President Obama’s tweet after winning the 2008 election will be archived.  If you look at it from a panic standpoint, yes, your tweet on the trending topic of #sexisgoodwhen will also be on record (if your tweets are part of the public timeline).

If the Library of Congress can archive Tweets, then they certainly can archive Facebook data.

The purpose of this post, however, is not to get you paranoid.  Just be mindful of the information that you put out there for the world to see. When you put electronic information out, you are leaving a digital footprint.  In some cases, it’s out there forever.  Just remember, YOU control what YOU put out there about YOU, and everyone doesn’t need to know every intimate detail about your life, thoughts, etc.

Thoughts?  Gather around the conference room table.

Scrubs: What Happened?

Published on: March 24, 2010
Comments: 1 Comment

http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/24/scrubs-dead-or-alive/

If you’re a fan of the TV show, Scrubs, then you have probably noticed the sudden decline of the show since it went from NBC to ABC.  As mentioned in the CNN article above, the writer’s strike from ’07-’08 had a lot to do with the show’s demise.  J.D., one of the show’s main characters (if not the main character), is no longer on the show… along with several other core cast members.

I was aware that the show had moved to ABC, so I tuned in one night.  A few of my observations:

- Midway through watching Scrubs 2.0, I thought I was watching Saved By the Bell: The New Class.

- Watching the new Scrubs is like looking at the Matrix in a different hue of puke-green.

- Comic Book Guy, from The Simpsons, made an appearance sometime during the show.  He was quoted as saying, “Worst…episode…ever.”  Another episode aired the following week.

- I wasn’t aware at first that J.D. wasn’t on the show anymore.  After realizing he wasn’t there, I figured they had killed him off… or maybe there were some budget cuts… or he pulled a Katherine Heigl

- This just in:  The ABC version of Scrubs will be the first television show to come out on View Master instead of DVD/Blu-Ray.

Needless to say, the new version sucks!

Anti-Resolution

Happy New Year.  Welcome to a new decade and all that jazz.

As I go into the New Year, I dread going back to the gym.  Every year I have to wait hours on end to get to my machine because someone has decided that their new years resolution is to take off a few thousand pounds this year only to give up in a week when they realize it actually takes work.

I hate resolutions.  Most people make them and never stick to them.  I also don’t like them because I feel like you knew you needed to change well before the New Year started.

A read a blog today on Biggerpockets.com  that said it best (read the full entry here)…

Resolutions are generally nothing more than a “wish list” of things people want in their lives. They seldom remember them by mid-year, much less bring them to fruition by year end. This truth is why the whole resolution process has been diluted to not much more than the punch line of a joke….But isn’t the quality of your life more than a joke? Isn’t the quality of your relationships more than an item on some vague “wish list”?

 

Why not decide today, right now, to make 2010 the year you took your life back from mediocrity? Instead of treating your hopes and dreams like a “wish list”, create a plan to make them a reality. Create your life, don’t just “get through” it. You do not have to settle for an average life. Instead of resolutions, write down clear, vivid goals…then start to plan specific actions steps to achieve them. I can tell you from experience, if you begin to unlock your mind to your true potential, you will transform your life. I’ve done it.

There is only one person who can change your life…YOU. And you can do it, you simply have to break free from the chains of self-limiting beliefs. I’ve studied personal development for some time and only recently put it together to see my true potential. And I can promise you, once you take off the self imposed blinders of doubt and fear, life truly begins. Don’t live to someone else’s idea of what happiness is….design your life or someone else will….

So….resolve to not make resolutions…instead, take responsibility for your life…absolute responsibility…then you will start to live your dream life…

So Conference Callers.  Do you believe in resolutions?  Do you ever follow them?

Monday Roundup

mou900_digimemo_a501b

Here’s a quick recap of what’s transpired over the weekend, and in the last week:

Actress, Brittany Murphy, of “8 Mile,” and, “Clueless,” fame, died yesterday morning of natural causes: http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/12/20/brittany.murphy/index.html

The Cowboys kept the Saints from going undefeated, handing them their first loss of the season: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/6439/saints-far-from-perfect-as-playoffs-approach

The Senate voted to end debate on the controversial healthcare bill.  A final vote on the bill is expected on Christmas Eve: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/21/health.care.senate.vote/index.html

Avatar is the #1 movie in the world right now.  It’s being praised as one of the most visually amazing movies ever: http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/20/boxoffice.avatar.ew/index.html

Oh, and Tiger Woods is getting a divorce.

Is there anything we missed?  Which story, in your opinion, is the biggest story to happen in the recent days?

All Hail Google!!!

googledomination

A couple of weeks ago Kev did a post on Google and it’s aims at cloud computing.

I have been been keeping up with the news and it seems like everyday this week Google has had something in the news that will revolutionize the way we use computers.  Here are just a few things…

Google Goggles – This allows users to search by pics.

Real Time Searches – As you are typing it, it becomes a search result.

Google DNS – Bascially creating a phonebook of all websites for you.

And that’s just the tip of the ice berg.  Have you ever taken a look at everything Google offers. It’s kind of scary.

Don’t get me wrong.  I love Google.  I use Google Chrome.  I have a Gmail.  Account.  I was even thinking about getting the Droid at one time. 

I think they are creating a new realm of computing that we will all enjoy.  But they are also becoming a huge company that can rival Microsoft  and they collect a lot of your information everytime you use one of their products.  So let’s keep our eyes on King Google. 

What are you’re thoughts?  Do you think Google is scary?  Do you trust them?  Am I being paranoid? 

Don’t answer that last question.

Attraction-Harassment Scale

nice guy bad guy

 So you are at work, and Jimmy the office “nice guy” comes over to say good morning.  This is probably the hardest part of your day.  Now Jimmy’s a good guy, but you’re just not attracted to him.  And he usually lingers a little too long when he hugs you.  Well one day Jimmy takes your kind hug as his entry into trying something a little further.  Maybe he decides to tell you, “you look really nice” or “he wants to take you on a date”.  Now if you are a rational creature you will tell him politely no and hopefully it doesn’t ruin the office place acquaintance.  Or you could be crazy as a loon and call sexual harassment on him. 

 Then you have Kent.  Kent is the office Brad Pitt/Hottie/Slut.  Well one night you and Kent are working late and he decides he’s going to try to have his way with you.  Next thing you know, the copy machine is taking full color photos of your nether region.

 Now how is it that possible that two of your co-workers can approach in two different ways and get inexplicable results?  One guy almost gets a face full of pepper spray while being respectful and the other gets a chance to make a fond memory at the copy machine by treating you like dirt. 

 Well it’s a little thing I like to call the Attraction-Harassment scale. 

 Note: Don’t try to take it.  It’s already copyrighted.

 Attraction Harassment Scale

   There is basically an inverse relationship between how attracted you are to a person and how you gauge their actions towards you. 

 In other words… The uglier a person is to you, the less you will let them get away with. 

 It is derived from the Crazy-Hot scale from the show How I Met Your Mother?.  I love that show.  Barney Stinson for President!

 You see it all the time in your daily life…

 1.Regular dude sends a drink.  Girl takes it and pays him no mind.  Rich guy sends a bottle.  Girl goes home with rich guy.

 2.Girl attracted to a guy plays hard to get, and guy engages her in said game.  Girl not attracted to guy “pursuing” claims he’s a bug-a-boo/stalker.

 So give me an example of your Attraction-Harassment episodes.  Do you think the scale is right?

Sensory Overload!

bspwomancoveringears-300x300

There is a lot of news going on in the world today… a smorgasbord, if you will.

Unemployment is over 10%.

A 5 year old child is dead because her mother sold her into prostitution.

The President is capping off a week in Asia.  China told him, “Look, man.  You’re cool, but we hold a lot of your country’s debt.  Yet, you guys have a huge deficit.  So ummmm, yeah.  Do you think we don’t intend to get our money?  Gettin’ real tired of you duckin’ me maannnn!”

The Senate just unveiled a 2,074 page health reform bill. 

Speaking of healthcare, a government task force just concluded that women in their 40′s don’t need annual mammograms.

Beverly Hills Vampire 90210 Twilight: New Moon is coming out this weekend.

Jay-Z, Alicia Keys, and New York have the #1 song in the country right now.

Speaking of New York, the Yankees have more wins (2) in the month of November than the Jets, Giants, and Knicks. 

The Razorbacks are playing spades with their basketball team.  They have 5 in the starting lineup and a possible.

The State Lottery is bringing in money hand-over-fist…

And Sarah Palin is the most popular person in America right now.

I just don’t know where to begin!

What say you?  What news story, including or not including those mentioned above, has stood out the most to you this week?

The Truth Is in the Clouds…

cloud

Cloud computing is taking over.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/04/cloud.computing.hunt/index.html

Do you use Google Docs?  Do you upload videos to YouTube?  Are all of your vacation photos on Flickr?  Do you upload all of your photo albums on Facebook? 

If yes, then you’re cloud computing.

According to Wikipedia, cloud computing is Internet based development and use of computer technology.  The term, “cloud,” is a metaphor for the Internet.  Basically, everything we do and all of our services are conducted on the Internet.

Google is one of the main companies at the forefront of this new phenomenon.  There lies a possible future where computers may come without hard drives.  Everything would be stored “in the clouds.”  But can you trust what you can’t see?  Today, we already trust online banking with our most sensitive information. 

The truth really lies in a quote from the above article: “All the clouds live in data centers,” says Rich Miller, “There’s always hardware involved, and bricks and mortar. … It’s not a fluffy cloud. It’s living in someone’s building.”

Where do you see the future of computing going?  Do you fully trust cloud computing?  Would you completely rely on it?  Do you still prefer to back up most of your information on your own hardware?

Dear Women (My Ode to Thee) Pt. 1

Published on: October 29, 2009
Comments: 26 Comments

Shaking My Head

Dear Women,

My dear, dear women (sigh)… why do you do the things you do?

You walk out the house with that outfit on… cleavage popping out of your turtleneck… I try my best to keep eye contact, yet you take it as I’m trying to disrespect

Dear women,

My dear, dear women (sigh)… why do you do the things you do?

Your derriere is as wide as all out doors… daisy-dukes-spandex all over your butt… you walk in front of me, pulling your baby-tee down… and think that’s supposed to cover it up?

Dear women… my dear, dear women…

I woke up early in a good mood today… was feeling friendly so I said, “Hi.” … She translated it to, “Can I get your number?”… She thinks she’s a ten, but is just a five…

Dear women… my dear, dear women… SMH

-Kev

Death of Radio?

Published on: October 28, 2009
Tags: No Tags
Comments: 3 Comments

nytimes_wo_web_payola

http://news.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/10381/549087.html

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jul/03/business/fi-ct-radio3

La-da-da-daa… Hey, hey, heyyyy… Goooooodbyyyyyyye

This year, legislation was presented that would require radio stations to pay licensing fees for playing artists’ songs.  This already goes on today, as radio stations pay fees to publishing companies such as ASCAP and BMI in order to play songs by the company’s songwriters/copyright owners. 

The new legislation, called the Performance Rights Act, would require radio stations to pay fees to artists record companies for the “performance” of a song.  It would go something like this:

Beyonce, Taylor Swift, Mary J. Blige, etc, have songs on the radio.  Let’s say they didn’t write any of the songs they are actually singing.  Today, radio pays the publishing company of the songwriter in order to get a license to play the song.  If the Performance Rights Act is passed, radio stations would have to pay a fee to publishing companies for the songwriter/copyright owner AND a fee to the record companies for the artist “performing” on the actual sound recording. 

The music industry has been suffering for years… and it has been struggling even more in this economic climate.  Album sales are down from their hey-day in the 90′s.  Digital sales have skyrocketed.  The industry is more single-driven, where consumers buy singles or maybe a few songs off an album rather than the whole album.  CD’s are on their way to becoming obsolete.  Frankly, this seems like a last-ditch effort for record companies to get their hands on even more money that is supposed to go to the artists.

“But, Kev,” you say, “They pay those fees in Europe!”  Yes, they do.  But this is America.  And in America, AM/FM radio has historically been a promotional tool for artists.  Radio has been known to break artists, singles, bands, singers, no-talent-having hustlers, one-hit wonders, etc.  As I stated earlier, the music industry has been suffering.  That includes radio.  Radio makes its money from advertising.  Ad sales are down.  If this bill passes, it could be the end of radio… as we know it.

Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.  Key phrase, “… as we know it.”

Where would payola come into play if radio stations have to turn around and pay that money back?  Artists on major labels may get less airplay than independent or unsigned arstists simply because the latter is cheaper.  We may see a return to radio DJ’s actually playing music that isn’t on a playlist handed down to them from their corporate bosses.  DJ’s just might be able to actually DJ!  This could be good.

Then again… I’m not holding my breath on that.

But it is a nice possibility.  What say you?  Is the Performance Rights Act good or bad?  Who would benefit most from it?  The record companies?  The radio stations?  The consumers?  What do you see happening if it passes?

La-da-da-daaaa… Hey, hey, heyyyy… Gooooooooodbyyyyyyyyyyyyye!!!!

« page 2 of 3 »
Categories
Archives
May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Polls

What Do You Think Is the Most In-Demand Skill in Today's Job Market?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Welcome , today is Thursday, May 23, 2013