Sync Weekly

Archive for the ‘race’ Category

Shirley Sherrod: Special Comment

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

In the midst of Lebron moving to South Beach, the ongoing Epic Fail that is the BP oil spill, Lindsey Lohan going on vacation to  prison, and Mel Gibson saying “FML” in only so many words… a bigger news story managed to emerge this week.

As most of you may know, Shirley Sherrod, a U.S. Department of Agriculture official, was fired forced to resign and offered her job back in 48 hours.  A video of her giving a speech was edited to portray her as a black woman, in a position of power, using this power to exercise reverse racism against a white farmer.  She was painted as not helping the white farmer out because of his skin color and “superior attitude.”  (The events she recalled in the speech occurred 24 years prior)

That’s when fhit hit the san.  Things got real.  The plot thickened.  Fallout occurred:  The NAACP condemned her.  The White House, in an attempt to jump on the situation before Glenn Beck, threw her under the bus.  The media, primarily Fox News,  judged her faster than the word “prejudice” itself.  When the facts came out, and the full video surfaced, her speech was actually one of reconciliation, self-reflection, and the plight of poor people… regardless of skin color.  Oh, and it also helped that the very white farmer she was accused of discriminating against 24 years ago said she helped save his farm, and that she deserved her job back.

On Wednesday afternoon, Mrs. Sherrod was apologized to by the president of the NAACP, her superior at the department of agriculture (Mike Vilsack), and the White House.  She was also offered her job back.

Now that this story has reached its climax, what is there to say?  I believe Keith Olbermann said it best in the video below:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Speak American! ;)

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

Should driver's test only be given in English?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

The country is a buzz in the debate on how to deal with people who have legally and illegally entered our country.    One side wants tougher immigration laws and kick out the illegals and the other side wants to give them all amnesty.  Most of us fall somewhere in between the extremes.    A lot of places in the country have decided to adopt the idea of alternate languages since we are a melting pot.   Well Alabama gubernatorial candidate Tim James has taken a stance.   “This is Alabama; we speak English,” he says in a political ad, “If you want to live here, learn it.”  He vows that if he is elected state driving exams will only be giving in English.   I can understand his position.  Since all traffic signs are in English it would make sense that you would want to make sure your drivers could speak the language, of they were pulled over by the police  they could communicate effectively as to avoid any mishaps.  Well,a few people said his words were as a writer from Rachel Maddow’s blog puts “just plain mean”.

Well what do you think? 

1.When in Rome do as the Romans?  (When the country was founded, no matter what dark history it was founded under, English became dominant language and we should respect that)

2. Should America let every culture put their stamp on our everyday life?  (Only Native Americans are truly native to this country, so we should let everybody have free reign here.)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100428/ts_ynews/ynews_ts1831

Jackie Robinson Day

Friday, April 16th, 2010

kevin-blackistone.fanhouse.com/2010/04/15/jackie-robinson-day-whitewashes-baseballs-sordid-history/

No, conference callers Rice has not left the building, been deleted or shuffled loose this mortal coil. Not going to offer excuses, but I have returned.  Yesterday, apart from being tax day, was Jackie Robinson day in major league baseball. This prompted the article above from Kevin Blackistone.  I heard a lot of discussion on my local (Houston) sports radio affiliate about the merits of the article and the designation by MLB of Jackie Robinson day.

Mr. Blackistone calls the institution of Jackie Robinson day in major league baseball “a most-remarkable whitewashing of American History” and “one of the greatest public relations and marketing campaigns of all time.” He claims that “it pulled the wool over the eyes of an increasingly philistine public.” He also makes the assertion later in the article that Larry Doby’s charging of the mound 10 years later a more significant contribution for black dignity.

I believe that Mr. Blackistone is entitled to his opinion, of course, but I find that I disagree whole heartedly.  I believe that Robinson’s contribution was dramatic and deserving of praise for exactly the reasons why Mr. Blackistone dismisses it. Robinson was a fighter, as evidenced by his willingness to suffer a court martial rather than take a seat at the back of the bus while stationed in Fort Hood TX, but he was also smart enough to know what weapons served him best in the fight before him. He knew that he was fighting for something greater than himself. He knew that whatever personal satisfaction he may have garnered from physically fighting back was dwarfed by the consequences that they would have for future generations of non-white baseball players.

Was it wrong that he should have to approach the game differently than his white teammates? Yes. Was MLB’s instituting of Jackie Robinson day a PR “stunt?” Probably, but lets be honest what these days is not part of someone’s PR campaign. Should he have had to endure the racial epithets thrown around by fans, players, and umpires alike? No. What is right is the way he conducted himself. When others were behaving like animals he was a man and rose above the petty taunting of those around him proving himself better than those who would judge the worth of a man by anything other than his character.

I don’t claim to know all about everything that transpired between the beginning of the segregation of MLB and Robinson’s arrival on the scene, I wasn’t yet born, but I do believe that Robinson’s contribution is worthy of notoriety and honor. I also am of the opinion that sometimes the most heroic people in our lives are not the ones who make the biggest splash, but the ones who simply behave better (read more human) than anyone has any right to expect they should. Hows that for dignity my friends?

So, yeah I’m a fan of Jackie Robinson day, and not only because my Astro’s won their first game of the season with the whole team wearing #42 ;-)

What say you?

~Rice

Black or White: Negro & Post Racial America…

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

black-or-white_l

The election of Barack Obama was predicted to have ushered in a new, post-racial society.  In this post-racial society, color or race would no longer matter.  Are we there yet?

Not so fast, I would say.  In the past year, we have witnessed the controversial arrest of Professor Henry Louis Gates, The Beer Summit, President Jimmy Carter’s comments on hostility toward President Obama, members of the Tea Part, and Harry Reid’s comments.  Race matters, and it matters even more in the type of post-racial America that I see.

I don’t see a post-racial America where racism no longer exists.  The truth of the matter is that racism will always exist as long as evil exists.  I do, however, see a post-racial America where minorities are on track to being the majority; and more Americans will no longer view themselves as simply “black” or “white.”  I see the rise of multi-ethnic groups.

A recent Time article brings up the issue of the term, “Negro,” being used on the U.S. Census (View the article here). The article discusses many changes that the U.S. Census will be testing with the 2010 Census.  One of the possible changes is allowing respondents to check more than one box for race and Hispanic origin. Also, those who check “black” or “white” will be allowed to write in more specific information.

For years, through the eyes of racism, one drop of black blood meant that you were black.  Blue eyes and 0.001% melanin?  Yep, you’re white.

But if this change is implemented in the 2010 Census, bi-racial children will no longer have to identify with one group.  People of Arab descent will have a voice.  German-Irish?  Write it in.  Afro-Cuban?  Come on down.  Korean mother and Afro-Mexican father?  You’re invited too.  It’s a racial smorgasbord!

I pose two questions: 1) What is your vision of a post-racial America?  2) What race(s)/ethic groups do you identify with?

Do we all have a dream?

Monday, January 18th, 2010

images

 

http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/93321?fp=1

 

Should we celebrate MLK Day?  Should he not have been eligible as he was neither a President or a veteran as the article notes, or does MLK Day highlight the impact that private citizen can have in shaping the face of our country?  What about our school systems?  I recall being out not for MLK Day, but instead a “teacher resource day.”  I’ve even heard people claim to celbrate Robert E. Lee day instead.  If anyone thinks that racism doesn’t still exist just ask 100 people about MLK Day.  What are your thoughts?

-CMac

Should Racism Be Protected Under the 1st Amendment?

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

 first-amendment

Should Racism Be Protected Under the 1st Amendment?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

There is a story on CNN about Google having an image search result that had Michelle Obama altered to resemble a monkey.  Read the story here.

I know a lot of people have been petitioning Google to block this image, but I know I’ve seen pictures of George W. Bush on the internet looking the same way.  As a matter of fact, I know people have morphed his image onto a Curious George book.  I wasn’t the biggest fan of Bush, but I don’t want anybody treating him less than human…  And I really don’t want anybody treating our first lady that way.  But in both cases, I feel people have the right to do and say what they want as long as they aren’t impeding on the rights of another person.  But I’ll ask you guys:

Is racism protected under the 1st amendment?  Do hate speech and/or acts (making pictures… not beating on people) fall under the 1st amendment?  Let me know why.  Also, should Google have blocked this image?

Oh yeah and

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!! 

 from all of us at THE CONFERENCE CALL

WHEN KEEPING IT REAL GOES WRONG…

Friday, November 20th, 2009

1282767-H

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/19/walmart.trial/index.html

I believe the appropriate way to start this post off is with a famous quote from the Chappelle Show:  “I DON’T LIKE PEOPLE PLAYING ON MY PHONE!”

With that said, I”m sure most of you by now have heard about the Heather Ellis case.  Here’s the Cliffnotes version of what happened:  She was in Kennett, Missouri, visiting relatives while home from college.  She went to Walmart with her cousin.  When they were ready to check out, her cousin got in one line.  She got in another line.  Ellis saw that her cousin’s line was moving faster, and walked over and cut in line with her cousin.  People were mad.  Words were exchanged.  The police were called.  Now she is facing 15 years if convicted. 

Your favorite bloggers on The Conference Call decided to discuss the issue:

Wood: How about this nonsense???

C-Mac: I dunno.  Which part do you think is nonsense?

Kev:  Uh ohhhhhh… I see a potential blog topic brewing!  LOL. 

C-Mac: 1.  Does racism exist?  Still?  Yes.

2.  Are you ever going to get away with assaulting police officers?  No.

3.  Is line cutting at Wal-Mart some sh!t?  Yes.  And I’ve called people out for it.  But I called them inconsiderate A-holes.

4.  Can an entire group of people all tell the same wrong story?  Yes.

5  Should she have plead it out for probation as opposed to facing a felony and going to jail for years?  When there’s physical evidence of assault?  Yes.  All day, every time.

Kev: It’s her word against the townspeople and policemen.  I usually give everyone the benefit of the doubt, but watch Rosewood, Mississippi Burning, or Three Little Girls… heck, just read To Kill a Mockingbird and you know a black man’s word against a white man or woman’s word is no good in smaller, racially aggressive towns.  Also, if I’m in one line, and Wood is in another line, then I’m going to go over to his line all day, everyday if it’s moving faster.  It happens all of the time.  I think she was harassed and those doing the harassing caught her on a bad day.  She was a college student visiting her relatives.  I’m sure any other black person who actually lived in that town would have kept their head down, said, “Yes, sir,” and just kept it moving. 

C-Mac: I don’t disagree with any of that, except the cutting.  Let’s be specific.  Debbie and I get in different lines.  We have one set of purchases.  Ok, you diversified your risk.  As opposed to me and Wood, picking two lines, mine goes faster, so I let him cut, buy his stuff, then I buy mine.  That’s not the same.

Other than that, I totally agree with you.  She was down at Xavier and probably had a chip on her shoulder, b/c she did in fact come from a town full of racist a-holes. 

YOU WILL NEVER ASSAULT THE COPS AND WIN.  And if you can plea it and go on with your life far far from this backwoods place, I think you do it as opposed to going on trial for assaulting cops.  It’s not a good charge to face, even for a cause, a cause that you can’t win.  You can’t change people that ignorant, if they truly are ignorant enough that every single one of them if telling the same untrue story…your win is getting out, being successful, and living in harmony with non-ignorant neighbors.

Kev: We have to agree to disagree on the cutting thing.  One set of purchases?  Fine.  If it’s two different purchases?  Still fine.  How?  I’m letting you get in front of me.  You didn’t cut in front of the person behind me.  I’m letting you cut in front of me.  It’s no different than me letting a nice, elderly lady go in front of me.  Are the other people in line going to call the cops and Riverdance on my head for doing that? 

I agree about the cops thing.  Maybe that’s why she was born in this generation rather than in 1932.  She wouldn’t have made it apparently.  LOL.

Rice: I don’t have a problem with two sets of purchases and letting someone cut, but that does not sound like what happened here.  The way I read the story Ellis, took it upon herself to join her cousin in the faster moving line and did not cut in front of them, but cut in front of the person behind the cousin and then proceeded to push another patron’s items back along the conveyor belt to make room for her purchases (very rude and uncool).  Whatever happened afterward, the fact that her voice was heard at the back of the Wal-Mart before the police were called doesn’t really tell me that she handled the situation well from the off.  I imagine that the officers, hearing the situation before they arrived were probably predisposed to “aggressively” handle the situation.  That being said, it sounds like this town has had racial issues, and perhaps continues to, but this situation began with stoopid issues, not racial ones.  It is possible that racial issues exacerbated the problem, but until we have more of the evidence I cannot make a determination that I am fully comfortable saying is 100% correct.

Wood: Again this is all Blah, Blah, Blah.  She was wrong for being belligerent.  The cops were wrong for overreacting.  But guess whose going to lose when there are two wrongs?  So she should have taken the plea and shut up.  I bet she will really see it that way when she’s Big Bertha’s girlfriend for 15 years.

C-Mac: She should have taken the deal not because there were two wrongs and she is the black person.  She should have taken the plea b/c she assaulted the police.  People can SAY whatever they want, and they’re wrong for it a lot of the time.  But you can’t hit people.  You REALLY can’t hit cops.  It’s a universally unwinable proposition.

Kev, you can do math…

I’m in line.  I’m behind someone, and in front of someone.  If you cut in front of me, you cut in front of everyone behind me.  Most people wouldn’t make an ordeal out of it, but that’s what you did.  There is no difference whatsoever to the person behind me if you cut in front of me or them.

And yes, nice elderly people get a pass.  Young able men that are just in a big d*mn hurry, not so much.  Will I let the mom wagging 4 kids around, trying to buy one bottle of children’s Tylenol?  Yes.  The stoner looking dude with a bag of Doritos and 14 Totino’s pizzas?  Not so much.

Kev: I knew you would come with that logic.  My perception is that it’s my spot and I can let anyone go in front of me if I choose to do so. 

C-Mac: Ok, I’m overly logical…but I added in the compassionate part too!  :o P

Your spot isn’t a possession, it’s part of a system…a larger system of commerce.  There’s a social contract.  Apparently we don’t all feel the same way.  But that’s cool.  Like I said, I’m not likely to get bent out of shape about it in most cases.  But there’s the occasional person that blatantly abuses it, and that’s not cool.  I’m also a lot more easy going than I used to be, probably a product of age and having real issues to deal with in life.  The more big stuff you have, the easier it becomes to not sweat the small stuff.

Kev: Good breakdown.  Understood.  I just like to take that logic, and apply it to other situations.  There’s always room for abuse and someone is always going to be mad.

Should the driver behind you with road rage, already 10 minutes late & working on his 3rd strike at work, shoot you or the person you let get in front of you?

C-Mac: No, and point taken.

On the other hand, when we let people over we’re letting them get to an exit, onto a roadway from an exit, etc…  There’s 2000+ lbs of metal moving very quickly, and there’s a sense of urgency, esp. if you’re literally running out of lane.

Don’t be 10 minutes late w/ 2 strikes, or know that there are consequences…and talk your way out of them.

The consensus: We agree to disagree on cutting in line.  When you catch the wrong person on the wrong day, they can get belligerent.  With that said, never hit a cop… and especially if you’re black!

LATE BREAKING UPDATE!!!

Wood: 

http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2009/nov/19/man-accused-squeegee-attack-conway/

 A Conway man is due in court on charges he used a gas pump squeegee to hit another man during a fight over who was first in line at a gas pump.

Twenty-one-year-old Hector Chavez is to be arraigned Friday in Faulkner County Circuit Court on a second-degree battery charge.

A Conway police report says the victim told officers that he was waiting in line at a gas pump when Chavez cut in front of him. The victim — who was not identified — said he confronted Chavez with the squeegee and swung at him before Chavez took the squeegee and began beating him with it.

A phone listing could not be found for Chavez and it wasn’t clear whether he had an attorney.

CMac:  Because he successfully defended himself?  I guess he could have taken it away and then threatened the guy, but seriously, dude got what he deserved…

 

Kev:  Ironically, it starts with cutting in line. ;o)

 

 CMac:  Dude, I’m telling you, line cutting is LINE STEPPING.  Don’t be a habitual line-stepper.  It’s not ok.  You may get arrested.  Even if you’re the victim of racism, or even if you’re attacked by a dweeb with a squeegee.

Holy Wars: Murder Has No Religion

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

1410023

I was reading on Cnn.com yesterday, and came across a very interesting commentary by Arsalan Iftikhar, an international human rights lawyer.  Iftikhar had some interesting thoughts recenty tragedy that occurred in Fort Hood, Texas, and the aftermath in the media.  Here is his opinion on the matter:

Most of the world’s 1.57 billion Muslims know that the Holy Quran states quite clearly that, “Anyone who kills a human being … it shall be as though he has killed all of mankind. … If anyone saves a life, it shall be as though he has saved the lives of all of mankind.”

Accordingly, it should come as little surprise to any reasonable observer that when Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan recently committed his shocking acts of mass murder at Fort Hood, Texas, America’s Muslim community of over 7 million felt an added sense of horror and sadness at this senseless attack against the brave men and women of the U.S. armed forces.

True to form, many conservative media pundits wasted little time in pointing to reports that Hasan had said “Allahu Akbar” (Arabic for “God is great”) at the start of his murderous rampage. News coverage continuously showed the looping convenience store black-and-white videotape footage of Hasan wearing traditional white Islamic garb.

First of all, someone simply saying “Allahu Akbar” while committing an act of mass murder no more makes their criminal act “Islamic” than a Christian uttering the “Hail Mary” while murdering an abortion medical provider, or someone chanting “Onward, Christian Soldiers” while bombing a gay nightclub, would make their act “Christian” in nature.

Simply put; murder is murder and has no religion whatsoever.

Professor Juan Cole of the University of Michigan once wrote that, “One most certainly does insult Muslims by tying their religion to movements such as terrorism or fascism. Muslims perceive a double standard in this regard: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols would never be called ‘Christian terrorists’ even though they were in close contact with the Christian Identity Movement. No one would speak of Christo-fascism or Judeo-fascism as the Republican[s] … speak of Islam-o-fascism. … [Many people also] point out that [it was] persons of Christian heritage [who] invented fascism, not Muslims.”

According to Pentagon statistics, there were over 3,400 American Muslims serving in the active-duty military as of April 2008. The Wall Street Journal reported that many officials believe “the actual number of [American] Muslim soldiers may be at least 10,000 higher than the Pentagon statistics.”

Thus, with thousands of patriotic American Muslim women and men proudly serving in our United States Army in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, perhaps it would behoove our army leaders to consider sending a strong message of American unity by appointing an American Muslim to be a part of the prosecution team against Hasan.

This would help show that the mass murders allegedly committed by Hasan have nothing to do with the teachings of our religion.

The United States Army can send a resounding message to all Americans and the rest of the world that the social fabric of our country will never become unraveled by murderous (and irreligious) gun-wielding felons — whether it is a Muslim in Fort Hood, Texas, or a non-Muslim on a shooting rampage in an Orlando, Florida, high-rise less than a day later.

By appointing a multicultural (and multireligious) legal prosecution team made up of military lawyers of all races and religions, we can set a good example to show the rest of the world that our American legal justice system is truly equal for all people, regardless of their race, religion or socioeconomic status.

The larger point is that Muslims in America completely disavow and wash our hands of any acts of murder (or terrorism) claimed to be performed in the name of our religion. Acts of mass murder, regardless of their time or place, are simply ungodly criminal acts that have no religion whatsoever.

Do you agree or disagree with Iftikhar?  Did he make good points?  Do you believe the tragedy in Ft. Hood had religious ties? 

Ask a Black Guy Part 2.

Friday, October 16th, 2009

In the spirit of trying to keep dialogue going between the races, we thought we’d bring you a new installment of “Ask a Black Guy”.  Let’s see when it comes to women if we are all that different.  So all my black guys out there answer this question for me:

What are the top 5 things you are thinking when you first meet a girl?

Here are mine…
1.  I hope she’s not ghetto
2.  Dang, look at that butt/rack!
3.  I hope I don’t say anything stoopid.
4.  I hope she doesn’t smoke.
5.  I wonder how long it will take me to get her in the sack.

 -Trillionaire Wood

Rush Gets the Stiffarm…

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

rush_limbaugh2

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/10/14/limbaugh/index.html?cnn=yes

If you have been following the news this week, you may have noticed that Rush Limbaugh has shown interest in trying to buy an NFL team… the St. Louis Rams to be exact. 

“What’s the fuss,” you ask?  Why?  What’s the big deal?

Well, besides the fact that Limbaugh is a polarizing figure in all things political and racial here in America… here are a few remarks that have come out of Limbaugh’s mouth over the years:

“I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”

“You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.”

“They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?”

“I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.  They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well.  I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve.”

“Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.”

The last two comments alone are enough to make NFL commissioner, Roger Goodell, uneasy.  I find it ironically funny that he has made these comments, only to…

Wait!  It’s not funny.  It’s business!  Like Glen Beck (another polarizing figure who claims to be a businessman), Limbaugh was seizing a business opportunity.  He has every right to.  This is America, right?  And in America, we have a mixed economy that thrives off capitalism.  For all of the repulsive, polarizing, and controversial statements that Beck and Limbaugh have made over the years, they are capitalists at the end of the day.  They’re businessmen… and I really can’t knock them for that.  I’m a capitalist myself.

What I can do is bring light to the issue, and celebrate the fact that Limbaugh was dropped from the group seeking to buy the Rams. Just because you’re a capitalist in America doesn’t make it right.  As Limbaugh said in his first quote that I listed above, slavery had its merits.  It built the South. 

And I’m sure those slave-owners were capitalists in their own minds. <Extreme Sarcasm>

-Kev