Sync Weekly

Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

Anti-Resolution

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Happy New Year.  Welcome to a new decade and all that jazz.

As I go into the New Year, I dread going back to the gym.  Every year I have to wait hours on end to get to my machine because someone has decided that their new years resolution is to take off a few thousand pounds this year only to give up in a week when they realize it actually takes work.

I hate resolutions.  Most people make them and never stick to them.  I also don’t like them because I feel like you knew you needed to change well before the New Year started.

A read a blog today on Biggerpockets.com  that said it best (read the full entry here)…

Resolutions are generally nothing more than a “wish list” of things people want in their lives. They seldom remember them by mid-year, much less bring them to fruition by year end. This truth is why the whole resolution process has been diluted to not much more than the punch line of a joke….But isn’t the quality of your life more than a joke? Isn’t the quality of your relationships more than an item on some vague “wish list”?

 

Why not decide today, right now, to make 2010 the year you took your life back from mediocrity? Instead of treating your hopes and dreams like a “wish list”, create a plan to make them a reality. Create your life, don’t just “get through” it. You do not have to settle for an average life. Instead of resolutions, write down clear, vivid goals…then start to plan specific actions steps to achieve them. I can tell you from experience, if you begin to unlock your mind to your true potential, you will transform your life. I’ve done it.

There is only one person who can change your life…YOU. And you can do it, you simply have to break free from the chains of self-limiting beliefs. I’ve studied personal development for some time and only recently put it together to see my true potential. And I can promise you, once you take off the self imposed blinders of doubt and fear, life truly begins. Don’t live to someone else’s idea of what happiness is….design your life or someone else will….

So….resolve to not make resolutions…instead, take responsibility for your life…absolute responsibility…then you will start to live your dream life…

So Conference Callers.  Do you believe in resolutions?  Do you ever follow them?

Attraction-Harassment Scale

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

nice guy bad guy

 So you are at work, and Jimmy the office “nice guy” comes over to say good morning.  This is probably the hardest part of your day.  Now Jimmy’s a good guy, but you’re just not attracted to him.  And he usually lingers a little too long when he hugs you.  Well one day Jimmy takes your kind hug as his entry into trying something a little further.  Maybe he decides to tell you, “you look really nice” or “he wants to take you on a date”.  Now if you are a rational creature you will tell him politely no and hopefully it doesn’t ruin the office place acquaintance.  Or you could be crazy as a loon and call sexual harassment on him. 

 Then you have Kent.  Kent is the office Brad Pitt/Hottie/Slut.  Well one night you and Kent are working late and he decides he’s going to try to have his way with you.  Next thing you know, the copy machine is taking full color photos of your nether region.

 Now how is it that possible that two of your co-workers can approach in two different ways and get inexplicable results?  One guy almost gets a face full of pepper spray while being respectful and the other gets a chance to make a fond memory at the copy machine by treating you like dirt. 

 Well it’s a little thing I like to call the Attraction-Harassment scale. 

 Note: Don’t try to take it.  It’s already copyrighted.

 Attraction Harassment Scale

   There is basically an inverse relationship between how attracted you are to a person and how you gauge their actions towards you. 

 In other words… The uglier a person is to you, the less you will let them get away with. 

 It is derived from the Crazy-Hot scale from the show How I Met Your Mother?.  I love that show.  Barney Stinson for President!

 You see it all the time in your daily life…

 1.Regular dude sends a drink.  Girl takes it and pays him no mind.  Rich guy sends a bottle.  Girl goes home with rich guy.

 2.Girl attracted to a guy plays hard to get, and guy engages her in said game.  Girl not attracted to guy “pursuing” claims he’s a bug-a-boo/stalker.

 So give me an example of your Attraction-Harassment episodes.  Do you think the scale is right?

Sensory Overload!

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

bspwomancoveringears-300x300

There is a lot of news going on in the world today… a smorgasbord, if you will.

Unemployment is over 10%.

A 5 year old child is dead because her mother sold her into prostitution.

The President is capping off a week in Asia.  China told him, “Look, man.  You’re cool, but we hold a lot of your country’s debt.  Yet, you guys have a huge deficit.  So ummmm, yeah.  Do you think we don’t intend to get our money?  Gettin’ real tired of you duckin’ me maannnn!”

The Senate just unveiled a 2,074 page health reform bill. 

Speaking of healthcare, a government task force just concluded that women in their 40’s don’t need annual mammograms.

Beverly Hills Vampire 90210 Twilight: New Moon is coming out this weekend.

Jay-Z, Alicia Keys, and New York have the #1 song in the country right now.

Speaking of New York, the Yankees have more wins (2) in the month of November than the Jets, Giants, and Knicks. 

The Razorbacks are playing spades with their basketball team.  They have 5 in the starting lineup and a possible.

The State Lottery is bringing in money hand-over-fist…

And Sarah Palin is the most popular person in America right now.

I just don’t know where to begin!

What say you?  What news story, including or not including those mentioned above, has stood out the most to you this week?

Are You Blind?

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

geordi_laforge

Well this year we have seen some pretty horrific crime stories?  But a lot of these things seem like they could have been avoided if someone would just open their eyes.  Let’s look at some of these things.

Jaycee Lee Duggard

This young lady was kept in someone’s backyard for 18 years and noone noticed anything.  I find that hard to believe.

and then there’s this crazy fool.

Anthony Sowell

Who has killed at least 11 women and had them stashed in his house.   You mean to tell me you have 11 bodies stinking up the neighborhood and no one noticed anything. I find that hard to believe.

Then the most tragic story of all.  The beautiful

Shaniya Davis

Who was sold by her own mother into sexual servitude.  Here dad thought it was okay to leave her with her mom because she found employment.  Now I’m not the brightest bulb in the box.  But I don’t understand how you thought it was ever okay to leave these two together.

AP_photoap_antoinette_Shaniya_091116_mn

 

Are people just oblivious these days?  Or am I reading too much into these things?  Or am I expecting too much out of people?  Let me know my conference call people.

-Trillionaire Wood

Dear Women (My Ode to Thee) Pt. 1

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

Shaking My Head

Dear Women,

My dear, dear women (sigh)… why do you do the things you do?

You walk out the house with that outfit on… cleavage popping out of your turtleneck… I try my best to keep eye contact, yet you take it as I’m trying to disrespect

Dear women,

My dear, dear women (sigh)… why do you do the things you do?

Your derriere is as wide as all out doors… daisy-dukes-spandex all over your butt… you walk in front of me, pulling your baby-tee down… and think that’s supposed to cover it up?

Dear women… my dear, dear women…

I woke up early in a good mood today… was feeling friendly so I said, “Hi.” … She translated it to, “Can I get your number?”… She thinks she’s a ten, but is just a five…

Dear women… my dear, dear women… SMH

-Kev

What ever happened to “Howdy?”

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Howdy_Full

Something C-Mac said in one of his comments Monday struck a chord with me.  I pose the question “What is wrong with getting personal with people?”

I was not born South of the Mason Dixon line, but I like to say that I got there (to Texas) as fast as I could.  I was raised in Texas and while the South has been much maligned for their mistreatment of people (mostly people of color) and rightly so in many cases, there used to be a sense of politeness that I fear has been homogenized out of Southern society.  In this I feel that we have failed to keep the best of our traditions while rejecting the worst.

I know that I may get flamed for bringing this up, but there is a tradition at Texas A&M University (I attended briefly) simply known as “Howdy!”  When I walked across campus my freshman year I was not met with averted glances or ignored completely.  Almost without fail every student I passed would say “Howdy!”  It seems a little thing, but it seems to me those little things are the kinds of things I’m beginning to miss the most as our society and technology increasingly isolates us from one another.  As misanthropic as I can be at times those little things make me think that there is hope for us yet.  A birthday greeting on facebook, a “friend request” from someone you knew years ago, or a random IM conversation with an old friend all of these things usually elicit a smile from me, but I think that sometimes we begin to feel so connected to the people “in our lives” through technology that we overlook all of the people who could be in our lives.  More and more I walk through the store or (God forbid) the mall and fall into the now accepted practice of avoiding eye contact and quickly retreating to my own little world.  Why does it have to be that way?  Didn’t there used to be a saying “There are no strangers, only friends we haven’t met yet?”  I know that there are sick people in this world and I know I don’t necessarily want to be “connected” to them, but I can’t help but feeling that if everyone felt more connected to each other we, collectively, might begin to suppress many of the impulses we are more likely to indulge privately without the intervention of an over reaching government.

Growing up my parents didn’t feel that they had to have their own eyes on me all the time because the other parents in the neighborhood were sure to turn me in for acting a fool as well as to keep an eye on all of us as we rode, ran, and played.  This didn’t happen through osmosis.  It happened because people used to take banana bread to the new neighbor and get to know the people that they came into contact with.  We spent the night with the kid down the street and Mom and Dad were able to watch the kinds of movies they didn’t want to expose us to.  Kids played football in the yard shot each other with Nerf guns (or pointed fingers), built forts with cardboard boxes that disintegrated the next time it rained.  If we were lucky there was someone with some 2×4’s and plywood and a parent who didn’t care that the corner of their back yard housed a ramshackle hut that looked like it was built by a couple of 10 yr olds.  None of this just happened, but it did just happen.  Just by introducing themselves our parents created connections with people they came to trust.  They didn’t always agree idealistically or politically, but shared meals with perfect strangers who became friends.  It seems to me now we have to create excuses to connect to people.  We pre-qualify new friends or romantic interests by checking out their online profiles and gauging their fitness to become part of our circle, and we guard our circles vigilantly.

I am as guilty as anyone of this.  I go to work, I go to school, I go straight home, and often I only physically talk to people if I must.  I know that I am coming off as a bit of a curmudgeon, and as the ranking “old timer” around here I can deal with that.  I’m not trying to say that technology is bad, or that our privacy is something that we should sacrifice, neither am I trying to say “it was so much better back in the good ole days.”  What I am saying is that even in our technological connectedness there is too much distance between us.  I would be willing to bet that everyone who reads this lives within a hundred yards of someone they’ve never said as much as “Howdy!” to.

You won’t believe what I SAW (6)!

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

 

(NOT A REVIEW, NO SPOILERS)

First off, let me say that we all have guilty pleasures…little indulgences that we’re not particularly proud of and wouldn’t want the world to know about per se. I’ll confess – I feel compelled to go see the Saw movies, in the theater, even though we’re up to 6 now, with 7 in pre-production. I know they’re bound to be gore fests with a mediocre plot line, but a compulsion is what it is.

So I’m out with my wife after dinner for a little romantic film about human torture and morality, and at the end, I’m leaving the theater and I trip over someone. I’m not clumsy in the least, admittedly it was still a bit dark, but not to the extent that it inhibited my ability to see. No, dear readers, I tripped over this person because I didn’t see him…because I looked right over his head…because he was four feet tall, and about 10 years old, and was there with his mom. Oddly, I also noted kids of about 5 and 7 at the LAST Saw movie, also with mom. Frankly, I’m not sure I was old enough to see this film. I don’t scare easily, and I work in an emergency room overnight several nights a week – I’ve seen some gruesome things – but I was still tense in parts. When this kid turns into a little serial killer or goes to school and starts screaming M-Fer at his classmates, mom shouldn’t be the least bit surprised. Was the kid being punished for something?!? This kid probably wasn’t even eating solid foods when the first Saw movie hit theaters!!! Not to mention that any parent could claim they didn’t know what to expect…it’s Saw 6! The SIXTH installment. If you don’t know what’s going to happen, you’re certainly not in the loop enough to drop $9.25 a ticket to check it out.

I’m not usually one for telling people how to live their lives or raise their children, but I’m just as entitled to my opinion as these parents are apparently entitled to scar their childrens’ psyches. I don’t have children of my own sadly, but I certainly wouldn’t want them watching a film of this graphic nature at such a young age. They should be seeing Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs or something…it’s 3-D, right?

Should we step in and start making decisions for parents when they are seemingly unwilling or unable to make reasonable choices for their kids? I’m not saying that we start teaching Sex Ed in Kindergarten or anything radical of that nature. Jeff and I had a day long argument about whether Plan B should be available over the counter without a prescription, and whether a 16 year old girl should have to get a parent to go get the emergency birth control. I argued better they get the pill and the parents not be involved than for an already sexually active girl to be so afraid to face her parents that she waits until it’s too late, forcing even more complicated “adult” decisions to be made. Jeff argued that he didn’t want to take parents out of the loop. What about Saw, and rated R movies in general? Should Saw be NC-17 to keep the children of brain dead parents out? Can we change R to “no one under 17 admitted with or without their parents?” I think maybe we should.

-CMac

P.S. The Plan B debate was one that the 4 of us had via email prior to The Conference Call. If there’s any interest, I’d be happy to force the other 3 to rehash the argument for my your amusement intellectual stimulation.

Wood’s Season’s Greetings (Bah Humbug)

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

 

I can’t believe it’s the holiday season already.  We are only a few weeks from Halloween excuse for women to dress like sluts Day.  Then there is Thanksgiving excuse to over eat Day.  Then we have Christmas excuse to buy stuff you couldn’t afford and will be paying back for the next 10 years Day.  If you haven’t figured it out by now, I’m not a fan of the holiday season.  I do like the general goodwill that people have towards each other, and women dressing half naked always has a special place.  But seriously what is with all the pomp and circumstance?  Why do we do this nonsense for 3 months?  Then we make New Years Resolutions that we never keep to make up for the stupid decisions we’ve made for the last 3 months. 

So I have, generally, a negative view of the holidays (it’s probably because I hate winter).  The basic history of each holiday, and how they are celebrated now, kind of leaves me with a basic disdain.  On Halloween you rot kids’ teeth out and scare the crap out of them. On Thanksgiving you celebrate the destruction of the Native American populace.  On Christmas you don’t give out gifts… you give out obligations.  If you give me a gift, I’m now obligated to give you something. 

So how do you guys feel about the holidays?  Do you like them?  Do you hate them?  Why? 

This will be a new series for the Conference Call.  “The Holiday Season”.  We will be having Holiday Season-themed posts.  If you have a suggestion for a post drop us a line.

adVANCEd Notice

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Judge Chris Piazza has made headlines this week with his refusal to
keep a trial from being held away from the media.

http://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article.aspx?aID=117722.54928.129860&cID=c

I find this to be a dangerously negligent action.  He’s allowing the
court to be open during the trial and he won’t sequester the jury
during the trial.  I almost feel like they are railroading Mr. Vance.
I’m not here to discuss whether or not the man is guilty, but I am
here to discuss whether this man will ever get a fair trial.  And the
answer is no.  As soon as Mr. Vance was charged with this crime he was
already thought of as guilty in the hearts of the people.  I saw
reporters, colleagues of Anne Pressly, call him a murderer and other
names as he was escorted into the jail after his arrest.  People that
are suppose to seek the truth and have already called him guilty
before the evidence was brought to light.  And now like many trials,
I’ve seen this trial carried out in the media.  I’ve even found myself
wavering from whether or not I thought he was guilty based on what has
been said in the media.  And now the ridiculous actions of Judge
Piazza will make it even harder to make a rational decision in this
case.

How can you have an impartial jury when they get to hear the case
impartially through the media?  How can you have an impartial jury
that can be easily tampered with since they won’t be isolated? (This
seems like the movie Runaway Jury again)   And his “explanation”…

An open court hearing “is one of the most important rights there is,”
Piazza said. “I just think the more you hide, the worse it gets as far
as scrutiny.”

He’s full of crap.  What about the right to a fair trial for Vance.  I
won’t even go into the fairness of trial he won’t get because of how
race will play out in this situation.  That’s a whole blog topic in
itself.  But this really scares me because this isn’t just life in
prison.  This man is facing the death penalty, and I feel like he has
already been found guilty before the trial.

What do you guys think?  Will he get a fair trial?  Do you think court
cases should be open?  Should they only be open under certain
circumstances?  Let’s hear from you all.

“Civility: The Loser’s Virtue”

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Trillionaire Wood:

We’re sure you are tired of hearing from all of us everyday, so we brought in a guest blogger to tell us his fellings on all things Evil Rush Limbaugh and Diabolical Glenn Beck (just my pet names for them :) ).

(Opinions of this blogger are not necessairly the views of The Conference Call or Syncweekly)

With the disclaimer out the way.  Have at it Ricco…

Ricco:

The question of whether America is ready to embrace a black President was not answered November 4, 2008 and will likely remain unanswered until the end of Barack Obama’s Presidency and beyond.    However, a recent irreverent outburst by Congressman Joe Wilson (R-SC) on the floor of the House of Representatives during the President’s speech to a joint session of congress has caused some to answer the above question in the negative.  Maureen Dowd and former President Jimmy Carter have argued that Wilson’s comments were motivated by racism. Others argue that Wilson temporarily lost control of his emotions and his outburst was simply a momentary lapse in civility. I have no authority to judge whether or not Congressman Wilson is a racist, and I will not speculate on the matter.  However, I do contend that Congressman Wilson’s outburst was likely influenced by the twin themes of race-based politic and incivility that currently epitomize the Republican opposition.

The type of irreverent behavior exhibited by Wilson can easily be categorized as the height of political incivility.  Had such a slanderous offense been hurled at President Andrew Jackson, Wilson would have been asked to meet outside the chamber for a duel.  Although stunning in its ostentatiousness, Wilson’s lack of civility has been a trademark of Republican opposition throughout August and on full display in town halls across America.  While many Republicans approached these meetings as an opportunity to learn more about competing health care proposals, others arrived armed with republican talking points and determined to disrupt the free flow of information.  What’s more, this rancorous tone has been magnified by the race-based politics and name calling of conservative commentators.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News Networks commentators, the de facto leaders of the conservative party, have been playing offense with the race card since President Obama’s inauguration.  Limbaugh has called President Obama an “angry black man,” while Glenn Beck called him a “racist…with serious issues with white people.” Glenn Beck further aggravates the race issue by calling the President’s efforts on health care, “Reparations by Health Care Reform.”  Beck contends that “Obama’s health care plan” is “affirmative action on steroids;” designed to give African Americans a privileged position in health care. In one fell swoop, Beck places America back into the pre-civil rights era black versus white binary. His call to white Americans is to “protect your own” because the black president is doing the same at your expense.�

Beck, and his fellow extremist foghorns, encourage whites to flock to gun stores and expos to purchase artillery and munitions to defend themselves against the socialist bent on destroying their way of life.  To this group, President Obama is not your normal socialist, he is a hybrid Nazi fascist-socialist in the mold of Adolf Hitler.  His goal is to destroy white America to make way for the reign of the black “master race.” Outside of being preposterous, this sort of rhetoric is wholly and completely irresponsible.  While the First Amendment gives these commentators the right to speak in this manner, it does not make it prudent.

The tone of the current debate has gotten wildly out of hand.  Understanding the convergence of race-based politics and incivility is useful in understanding Congressman Wilson’s outburst and the general tenor of the opposition in our current political discourse.  Opposition commentators and representatives have employed name calling, race-baiting and fear mongering in their quest to dismantle the President’s agenda.  I’m sure they all carry bumper stickers reading “You Lie,” and “Civility, the Loser’s Virtue.”