Sync Weekly

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Obama, Noooooo!

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/13/obama.islamic.center.support/index.html

In New York, there has been a controversial debate whether an Islamic Center should be built near Ground Zero.   On Monday, the news soon spread that President Obama threw his support behind the proposal to build the Islamic Center.

My initial reaction upon hearing this (from 1:15-1:27):

Besides the fact that this news heats up the political landscape for the upcoming elections in November, it provides more fodder to those arguing the President is a foreign-born Muslim-Communists-Nazi, bent on setting up a Marxist-style government that allows death panels to kill grandma.

It’s just not a good look.

However, Obama did have great reasoning and justification for his support:

“Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country… That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,”

They say that there is nothing new under the sun, and that history repeats itself.  Our country’s first president, George Washington, responded to a letter,  from a Jewish citizen, which supported our newly formed government, and welcomed Washington on his goodwill tour.  Prior to the Revolutionary War, Jews in Newport, Rhode Island, were somewhat accepted, but not able to obtain political equality as citizens of Rhode Island.  Washington’s response to the letter:

“The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for giving to Mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection, should demean themselves as good citizens…

May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.”

This day in age, it is very easy (and wrong) to associate Islam with terrorism, extremists, and the like.  If we had the type of media and technology back in the days of Jim Crow that we have today, one could easily (and wrongfully) associate Christianity with extremists who lynched blacks, hated Jews, and burned crosses as a way of intimidation.

With all of that said, I know that, legally, those looking to build the Islamic Center have every right to do so.  I know that it is supposed to promote unity and peace in the midst of the tragedy that occurred at Ground Zero.   I also know that the wound of 9/11 still hasn’t fully healed; and I believe that it is somewhat disrespectful to the families of those who lost loved ones on 9/11, to build, next to Ground Zero, a center associated with a religion, that is still somewhat associated with negative sentiments.  And though these sentiments are wrong, it still takes time to heal.

In other words, right now,  it’s just not a good look.

Shirley Sherrod: Special Comment

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

In the midst of Lebron moving to South Beach, the ongoing Epic Fail that is the BP oil spill, Lindsey Lohan going on vacation to  prison, and Mel Gibson saying “FML” in only so many words… a bigger news story managed to emerge this week.

As most of you may know, Shirley Sherrod, a U.S. Department of Agriculture official, was fired forced to resign and offered her job back in 48 hours.  A video of her giving a speech was edited to portray her as a black woman, in a position of power, using this power to exercise reverse racism against a white farmer.  She was painted as not helping the white farmer out because of his skin color and “superior attitude.”  (The events she recalled in the speech occurred 24 years prior)

That’s when fhit hit the san.  Things got real.  The plot thickened.  Fallout occurred:  The NAACP condemned her.  The White House, in an attempt to jump on the situation before Glenn Beck, threw her under the bus.  The media, primarily Fox News,  judged her faster than the word “prejudice” itself.  When the facts came out, and the full video surfaced, her speech was actually one of reconciliation, self-reflection, and the plight of poor people… regardless of skin color.  Oh, and it also helped that the very white farmer she was accused of discriminating against 24 years ago said she helped save his farm, and that she deserved her job back.

On Wednesday afternoon, Mrs. Sherrod was apologized to by the president of the NAACP, her superior at the department of agriculture (Mike Vilsack), and the White House.  She was also offered her job back.

Now that this story has reached its climax, what is there to say?  I believe Keith Olbermann said it best in the video below:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Apology Not Accepted

Sunday, June 20th, 2010

Before getting into today’s post, let’s take a brief second to recap what has happened since our last post:

A BP oil rig explodes in the Gulf.

Oil starts leaking.

Size of the leak is underestimated.

More oil starts leaking.

Obama administration is criticized for time, type, and lack of response.

BP attempts to stop the leak, but doesn’t really know how to.

All of this could have been avoided by purchasing a $500,000 device a few years ago.  BP makes $67 million a day.

More oil is leaking.  Oil is affecting environmental life, fishing industry, etc.

President Obama addresses the nation.  The next day, he meets with BP executives and secures an unprecedented $20 billion for those affected by the oil spill.

BP executives go to Capitol Hill, and receive an apology…

A what?  Yes, an apology.  Texas Representative, Joe Barton, was quoted as saying the following to BP CEO Tony Hayward:

“Now I’m going to speak totally for myself. I’m not speaking for the Republican party, I’m not speaking for anyone in the House of Representatives but myself – I’m ashamed at what happened in the White House yesterday. I think it is a tragedy in the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown – in this case a $20 billion shakedown. The attorney general of the United States, who is legitimately conducting a criminal investigation and has every right to do so to protect the interests of the American people, participated in what amounts to a $20 billion slush fund. That’s unprecedented in our nation’s history, has no legal standing and which sets, I think, a terrible precedent for the future.

“If I called you into my office, and I the subcommittee chairman, Mr. Stupak, with me, who was legitimately conducting an oversight investigation on your company and said if you put so many millions of dollars in a project in my congressional district, I could go to jail, and should go to jail.

“There is no question that BP owns this lease. There is no question that BP made decisions that objective people think compromised safety. There is no question that BP is liable for the damages. But we have a due process system where we go through hearings, and in some cases court cases and litigation and determine what those damages are and when those damages should be paid. So, I’m only speaking for myself – I’m not speaking for anybody else – but I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or corporation that does something that is legitimately wrong, is subject to some sort of political pressure that is again, in my words, amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize.”

What do you think of Rep. Barton’s “apology?”  Was he right?  Did he have any points?  Was he totally out of line?  What say you?

Elena Kagan: Thoughts?

Monday, May 10th, 2010

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/05/10/scotus.kagan/index.html?hpt=T2

Last year, President Obama made history by nominating Sonia Sotomayor, who was later confirmed as the first Hispanic justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

With Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens retiring, President Obama has gotten another chance, in the same term, to nominate and seat a Supreme Court Justice.

Enter:  Elena Kagan.

At first glance, Kagan has an impeccable resume.  She is a Harvard Law School grad, served as dean of the law school, served as counsel in the Clinton administration, and is currently the *Solicitor General.  She is also highly regarded as having one of the most brilliant legal minds in the country.

*For those who don’t know, the Solicitor General is the counsel appointed to represent the Government of the United States of America before the Supreme Court of the United States.  Consider it Attorney General-lite.

She looks great on paper…

But she’s no judge though.

The fact that Kagan has never served as a judge seems to be the main flaw in her qualifications.

A few other interesting things about Kagan:

  • Kagan has previously written-off the confirmation process for Supreme Court nominees as, “a vapid and hollow charade.”  She has criticized the process for not pressing nominees enough to express their views on key constitutional issues.  This could come back to bite her.
  • She has attempted to block military recruiters from Harvard due to the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” policy.  Republicans won’t like this, and are likely to press her about this.  See: Vapid and hollow charade.
  • Kagan has defended the nation’s anti-terrorism strategy, famous from the days of the Bush Administration.  Republicans will like this.  Liberals are likely to show concern over this issue.

Overall, Kagan seems like a solid choice as a nominee.  What do you think of her as a nominee?  Any concerns?

Privacy? WTF Is Privacy?

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

The Library of Congress is archving every Tweet in the public timeline. How do you feel about it?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Do you have a Twitter account?

Have you considered running for public office any time soon?  Say, in the next… forever?

Consider this: http://www.loc.gov/tweet/how-tweet-it-is.html

“Have you ever sent out a “tweet” on the popular Twitter social media service? Congratulations: Your 140 characters or less will now be housed in the Library of Congress.

That’s right. Every public tweet, ever, since Twitter’s inception in March 2006, will be archived digitally at the Library of Congress. That’s a LOT of tweets, by the way: Twitter processes more than 50 million tweets every day, with the total numbering in the billions.”

In other words, the Library of Congress will have record of every #drunktweet, epic fail, crude joke, rant, and foot-in-the mouth statement we have ever made.

Kanye West made a song titled, “Big Brother.”  Now would be a good time to play it.

Anywho, if you look at it from a historical standpoint, tweets such as the first ever tweet and President Obama’s tweet after winning the 2008 election will be archived.  If you look at it from a panic standpoint, yes, your tweet on the trending topic of #sexisgoodwhen will also be on record (if your tweets are part of the public timeline).

If the Library of Congress can archive Tweets, then they certainly can archive Facebook data.

The purpose of this post, however, is not to get you paranoid.  Just be mindful of the information that you put out there for the world to see. When you put electronic information out, you are leaving a digital footprint.  In some cases, it’s out there forever.  Just remember, YOU control what YOU put out there about YOU, and everyone doesn’t need to know every intimate detail about your life, thoughts, etc.

Thoughts?  Gather around the conference room table.

“Free” Health Care!

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

You don’t have to pay.

Seriously… you don’t.  Follow me…

One of the more controversial parts in the new health care reform bill law is the individual insurance mandate.  The mandate is as follows:  By 2014, everyone must purchase health insurance or face a $695 fine annually.  There will be exceptions for low-income people.

This part of the bill has caused a lot of controversy.  Some people have expressed feelings of discomfort, worry, and anger over the fact that the U.S. government can mandate individuals to purchase a good or service.  The idea, originally a Republican idea, has been around since the Clinton administration, and was introduced as an alternative to the plan President Clinton proposed in the 1990’s.  Mitt Romney, a Republican, signed the requirement into law as Massachusetts governor in 2006.   As soon as the recent health care legislation was passed, the idea of individual mandates was touted as another case of “big government.”  Additionally, several states have threatened to sue the federal government because of the mandate.

Newsflash:  There is no penalty for not buying health insurance!

What?  Why?  How, you ask?  If you watched the video above, you would see towards the end how Lawrence O’Donnell points out a section in the health care bill law that states what the penalty is for not paying the fine.

There is no penalty.

What does this mean?  The government actually can’t make you buy health insurance.  In 2014, if you choose not to purchase health insurance, you could pay a $695 fine, if you want.  If you choose not to though, nothing will happen to you!

You would be better off taking that $695, and making it rain in a strip club.  I’m sure the Republican National Committee knows a lot about that. ;0)

Scrubs: What Happened?

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/24/scrubs-dead-or-alive/

If you’re a fan of the TV show, Scrubs, then you have probably noticed the sudden decline of the show since it went from NBC to ABC.  As mentioned in the CNN article above, the writer’s strike from ‘07-’08 had a lot to do with the show’s demise.  J.D., one of the show’s main characters (if not the main character), is no longer on the show… along with several other core cast members.

I was aware that the show had moved to ABC, so I tuned in one night.  A few of my observations:

- Midway through watching Scrubs 2.0, I thought I was watching Saved By the Bell: The New Class.

- Watching the new Scrubs is like looking at the Matrix in a different hue of puke-green.

- Comic Book Guy, from The Simpsons, made an appearance sometime during the show.  He was quoted as saying, “Worst…episode…ever.”  Another episode aired the following week.

- I wasn’t aware at first that J.D. wasn’t on the show anymore.  After realizing he wasn’t there, I figured they had killed him off… or maybe there were some budget cuts… or he pulled a Katherine Heigl

- This just in:  The ABC version of Scrubs will be the first television show to come out on View Master instead of DVD/Blu-Ray.

Needless to say, the new version sucks!

This Is Getting Out of Hand

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36020850/ns/politics-capitol_hill/

Did I go to sleep and wake up in the 1960’s?

Or maybe the revolution is being televised!

According to the MSNBC article linked above, at least 10 House Democrats have had to beef up security due to threats they have received because of their vote on the recent health care bill.  These lawmakers have received threatening calls, been victims of vandalism, and have even had their relatives targeted in some cases:

“Anne Caprara, the chief of staff for Markey, confirmed that the representative’s D.C. office has received at least two threatening calls. On Saturday, a man who spoke to the office’s health care legislative assistant warned that “[you] better hope I don’t run into you in a dark alley with a knife, a club or a gun.”

Concern about possible violence also escalated Wednesday after a severed gas line at the home of a Democratic lawmaker’s brother was discovered.”

Hello, When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong.  I’d like you to meet, When Politics Becomes Personal.

I understand the displeasure among those who were against this bill, but does it have to come to this?  Aren’t there more civil, peaceful means to show your displeasure?  Do we have to re-enact the riots, violent protests, and constant tension that occurred during the Civil Rights Movement?

Personally, I feel those who commit acts like these towards individuals are no better than terrorists who commit violence towards a group for a cause.  No, I am not calling these Americans terrorists, but their methods of making a point are eerily similar to a terrorist.

Two can agree to disagree.  At the point where you feel you must act in violence towards one you disagree with, that action points to a greater hate in your heart.

If you have a problem with a certain political party, ideology, or issue, then why attack the senator or representative behind it?  Get involved.  Vote.  Join an organization.  Call your congressmen and asks how to get involved.  Perhaps you could blog about it!

But during these times, when Americans need to stand together, help each other, and rebuild our economy, violence and hateful speech only makes things worse.

Healthcare Passes… Now What?

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Now that the health care reform bill has passed, how do you feel?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Late Sunday night, one of the most important and polarizing pieces of social legislation was passed.

An issue, that has been debated for decades, became legal reality.

President Obama’s health care reform bill was passed.  In what initially was supposed to have been a bipartisan initiative, the final vote on the bill received no Republican votes in the House.

The question of the moment, I ask, is now what?

From the start, this bill has been a polarizing topic in the country.  Rumors swirled:  Obama was Hitler.  Republicans were  villainous naysayers.  Grandma & grandpa’s future would be decided by death panels.  Town Hall meetings on the issue had a feel similar to a Klan rally.  Oh, and the Tea Party emerged as a new political voice.

But where do we go from here?

Sunday, a group of Tea Party demonstrators protested the inevitable passage of the bill as Democratic lawmakers made their way into the Capitol.  There were reports of racial slurs hurled at black lawmakers.  Barney Frank, an openly gay lawmaker, also was reported to have had slurs yelled at him.

Several states have threatened to sue the federal government due to individual insurance mandates included in the bill.  Although the mandates are a measure included to control costs, I personally am a bit “iffy” about the government requiring me to purchase goods and services I may not necessarily want.

Again, I ask, where do we go from here?  How do we move forward as a nation?  How do you feel about it?

Gather ’round… grab a cup of coffee… discuss!

State of the Union 2010

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

What Did You Like Most About President Obama's State of the Union Address?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

“I spit that Wonderama sh**, me and my conglomerates shall remain anonymous/Caught up in that finer sh**/Get that type of media coverage Obama get…” – Jay Electronica

As I’m currently watching the State of the Union address, it’s refreshing not to have heard, “YOU LIE!”

However, the address is still going on at the moment… so I’m still on cringe standby…

*Edit:  Now that the speech is over, I’m glad that there weren’t any Joe Wilson moments.

However we, here at The Conference Call, have put together a little poll (See above).   Take a few seconds to respond to it.

Also, we’ll be discussing the State of the Union Address in the comments section.  How do you feel President Obama has done so far?  What did you like about the address?  What did you dislike?  Over one year into office, what grade would you give him?  What grade would you give the address?